Interesting article on how BI applications have to be traced back through the Systems Development Life Cycle to become business information again. Here is a diagram from the article:
http://www.b-eye-network.com/view/index.php?cid=7566
Mark
Random thoughts from Mark on a variety of topics relating to Business Intelligence. My interests are organizational / cultural considerations for BI teams, making BI applicable to solve business problems, and ensuring BI delivery is as efficient as possible.
Interesting article on how BI applications have to be traced back through the Systems Development Life Cycle to become business information again. Here is a diagram from the article:
http://www.b-eye-network.com/view/index.php?cid=7566
Mark

Mark
Does this seem like an exercise in Entity Relationship (ER) modelling? Well to a certain extent it is, but the value an ontology adds on top of this is how these entities are related. This still seems like ER modelling, but lets see how this plays out...
Are all you data modellers out there feeling confused by all these relationships? 8) Real world relationships seldom fall into the typical hierarchical relationships so common in ER modelling. To fully describe the richness of all relationships we have to step back from the physical data structure and build out a separate meta data store that does not care about the structure, but does care about the context of the data and its relationships. This is typically stored within a database as a Triplestore, which breaks down relationships into "subject" "predicate" and "object".
A Person (subject) creates (predicate) a Marketing Strategy (object)
If each of these 3 pieces had a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that uniquely identified each piece, a deceptively simple data model can be created to handle any object and any relationship. In this way any object in the system can be related to any other object using 1 data model.
Once we have this ontology, the next logical step is to map this ontology to the physical data. This not only helps business users navigate data, it is a great tool to facilitate data integration efforts as we can map any data source against the business focused ontology.
What is the value of this for Business Intelligence? In the BI field we are constantly striving to take data and turn it into actionable intelligence. If we had a rich meta data layer that contained a validated ontology we could use this data to uncover correlations in data that would not be uncovered through a simple ER model. As the ontology is in business language it serves as a great tool to bridge the gap between physical data and business entities. This facilitates communication of the organization's data assets between business and IT to ensure no bit or byte goes un-leveraged.
This is but one tool to allow us to bring our users into the development of their applications, better yet lets get the business to own this "layer" since they know it best!
Mark
Well, I’m in sunny San Jose now, and am preparing for my first day at the Semantic Technology Conference. Before I dive into the seminars, I think it is important to step back and understand what specific questions I am trying to answer by attending this conference.
Here we go:
· How can we bridge the gap between information and human understanding to make information actionable?
· How do we build a business model that represents how the organization perceives it’s products, service and customers? How can we put such a business model in place to help us organize information in a way that it is accessible and takes us to the next level of comprehension?
· How can we leverage user-generated semantic data to enhance applications to add context?
· How can we create a data discovery process that is intuitive and returns results?
· How does Semantic Technology apply to both Business Intelligence and a Service Oriented Architecture?
I’ll throw these questions out for now, and will look to answer them over the next 3 days. I’ll be posting updates to this blog as I have time between sessions. If you have any input on the above, please comment away!
Mark